Sigma-L

Share this post
Oil: Hurst Cycles - 28th November 2022
www.sigma-l.net
Energy

Oil: Hurst Cycles - 28th November 2022

Oil seeps lower to our initial target of 78, on the path to the 18 month nominal low due early next year. In this short update we look at the progress and explore a subtle FLD crossing tip for experts

Nov 28, 2022
2
Share this post
Oil: Hurst Cycles - 28th November 2022
www.sigma-l.net

Tools required: Nominal Model | FLD | FLD Trading Strategy | FLD Trading Strategy (Advanced) | Principle of Nominality | Underlying Trend

Analysis Summary

Oil has moved down from what is likely the 20 week nominal peak early November. We noted in our last report that price may well track resistance at the 20 week FLD all the way down to the next 80 day nominal low, due late November:

From 4th November Report:

The 20 week FLD (green, medium and short term chart) is likely to be tracked all the way down to the end of November, should the phasing be accurate.

The target of 78 and 80 day FLD cross target of 80.85 have been met and exceeded, indeed price has breached what we have phased as the 20 week nominal low in late September. There is not too much to add from our last report but we do have the 18 month FLD cross target obtained from Sentient Trader at 34, which, given it’s bearish nature, allows us to talk about a subtle point of FLD support and resistance.

Sentient Trader takes the absolute crossing point of an FLD and extrapolates a target from there. This simplistic approach is borne of mechanical adherence to Hurst’s teachings but has a drawback in that it fails to recognise when price has found support or resistance at an FLD. This has been the case with the 18 month FLD in WTI Crude where price has generally straddled the FLD and then moved down. In our opinion when price is obviously straddling an FLD (price moves parallel or generally in lockstep with an FLD, generalised support or resistance) an analyst should take the highest (or lowest, in bullish scenario) crossing point of that FLD - when it is clearly breached.

Price forms support around the 18 month FLD in October and is straddling for several weeks it before falling past. The target should be calculated from the highest crossing point.

Using this approach, we can see from the above chart the crossing point is around 95, rather than around 80 with the strict mechanical approach. This gives us a target of 55, notably around the expected support of the 54 month FLD (orange, above). This approach should be applied to all FLD projections where there is obvious adherence of price to an FLD. To state it more overtly - when price moves in the same direction as the FLD and is in close proximity to the FLD, targets should be noted accordingly.

Another example in WTI Crude is shown below, this time with the 80 day nominal component and a recent buy side FLD cross.

Here the Sentient Trader crossing point would have been up at around 90, giving a target of 104. The generalised tracking of the 80 day FLD shown here alerts traders to the underlying trend and a better calculation for the component FLD cross target. The more accurate crossing point is down around 85, giving a target of around 94. This target was just met before price began the recent fall we explored in our last report.

At the immediate short term, price is likely in the final 10 day component of this current 80 day nominal iteration. There may be some further capitulation before the 80 day nominal low. In terms of phase, price is currently around 60 days along an average wavelength of 70-75 days. Interestingly price is around the level of the 9 year FLD, shown on the long term Sentient Trader chart below.

Time frequency analysis reveals the stationarity of the 80 day component and the less than stationary 20 day component! The 40 day component is also visible on the heatmap and has recently increased in frequency. The three dimensional view of the time frequency analysis reveals the heavily frequency modulated 20 day nominal component band at the left of the figure.

Phasing Analysis

Sentient Trader

Utilising a pattern recognition algorithm and Hurst’s diamond notation

Time Frequency Analysis

Wavelet convolution targeting 80 day nominal component

The nominal 80 day component is running at around 75 days from this sample. The latest iteration has been clear due to the somewhat neutralising effect of the 20 week nominal low, which pushed up late September. On the time frequency heatmap, the 40 and 20 day components are visible but heavily frequency modulated in comparison to the stationary 80 day component.

Trading Strategy

Interaction Status

Interactions and price in the FLD Trading Strategy (Advanced). This looks at an idealised 40 week cycle and an array of 3 FLD signal cycles. We apply the instrument’s phasing to the model and arrive at an overall summary for the interactions with the 20 day FLD, current and forthcoming.

  • Sigma-L recommendation: Neutral / No Trade

  • Entry: n/a

  • Stop: n/a

  • Target: n/a

  • Reference 20 Day FLD Interaction: n/a

  • Underlying 40 Day FLD Status: n/a

  • Underlying 80 Day FLD Status: n/a

Shorts held from the previous report which have not taken profit at the initial target of 78 should probably take some profit at this point.

Further shorts may be available at the peak of the next 40 day component, due mid December, for the proposed final move to the 18 month nominal low, due early February 2023. We will publish a further report mid December to comment on the entry.

Longer term holders can maintain a target of the 4.5 year FLD support down at around 50-60 and the 18 month FLD cross projection explored above.


FLD Settings

If you do not have the use of Sentient Trader use these settings to plot common FLDs in your trading software (daily scale) to more easily follow trading signals and strategy from Sigma-L.

Make sure to account for non-trading days if your broker omits them in the data feed (weekends, for example). The below offsets are given with no added calculation for non-trading days.

  • 80 day nominal: 70 days | 35 day FLD offset

  • 40 day nominal: 33.8 days | 17 day FLD offset

  • 20 day nominal: 17.1 days | 9 day FLD offset

  • 10 day nominal: 8.5 days | 4 day FLD offset


Correlated Exposure

A non exhaustive list of correlated instruments for consideration

United States Oil Fund LP $USO Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund XLE 0.00
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil UCO 0.00
Invesco DB Oil Fund DBO 0.00
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP USL 0.00
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF OILK 0.00
MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. 3x Leveraged ETN OILU 0.00
MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. -3x Inverse Leveraged ETN OILD 0.00
United States Brent Oil Fund BNO 0.00
iPath Pure Beta Crude Oil ETN OIL 0.00



DISCLAIMER: This website/newsletter and the charts/projections contained within it are intended for educational purposes only. Results and projections are hypothetical. We accept no liability for any losses incurred as a result of assertions made due to the information contained within Sigma-L. This report is not intended to instruct investment or purchase of any financial instrument, derivative or asset connected to the information conveyed in the report. Trade and invest at your own risk.
Share this post
Oil: Hurst Cycles - 28th November 2022
www.sigma-l.net
Previous
Next
Comments
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Sigma-L
Market data by Intrinio
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing